Electron Density Phantom Publications

Click on the links below to view on the journal website.

T, Medin J.  A dosimetric intercomparison between the radiation therapy clinics in Sweden. University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Research Report number: 2012:22 ISSN: 2000-0456. 2012.


Beardmore AB, Rosen II, Cheek DA, Fields RS, Hogstrom KR. Evaluation of MVCT images with skin collimation for electron beam treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008; 9(3):2773.  View


Mehran Y, Beaulieu L. Metal artifact reduction in helical CT for radiation therapy treatment planning. 2004; 50(4):139-140. View


Pemler P, Schneider U, Besserer J. Evaluation of the electron density phantom CIRS Model 62. Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik. 2001; 11(1):25-32. View


Hubbell JH. Photon Mass Attenuation and Energy-Absorption Coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV. International Journal Applied Radiation Isotopes. 1982; 33:1269-1290.


Judy PF, Adler GJ. Comparison of equivalent photon energy calibration methods in computed tomography. Medical Physics. 1980; 7:685-691.  View


Millner MR, Payne WH, Waggener RG, McDavid WD, et al. Determination of effective energies in CT calibration. Medical Physics. 1978;  5(6):543-545. View


Tsukihara M, Noto Y, Hayakawa T, Saito M. Conversion of the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density based on a single linear relationship: an experimental verification using a clinical dual-source CT scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(9):N135-44. View


Jeong H, Lee SB, Yoo SH, et al. Compensation method for respiratory motion in proton treatment planning for mobile liver cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(2):4055. View


Tu S, Yang P, Hong J, Lo C. Quantitative dosimetric assessment for effect of gold nanoparticles as contrast media on radiotherapy planning. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2013;88:14-20. View


Gleisner KS, Ljungberg M. Patient-specific whole-body attenuation correction maps from a CT system for conjugate-view-based activity quantification: method development and evaluation. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27(10):652-64.  View


Beltran, C. (January 01, 2012). Image quality of an investigational imaging panel for use with the imaging beam line cone-beam CT. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics / American College of Medical Physics, 13, 1.) View


Annkah JK, Rosenberg I, Hindocha N, et al. Assessment of the dosimetric accuracies of CATPhan 504 and CIRS 062 using kV-CBCT for performing direct calculations. J Med Phys. 2014;39(3):133-41. View


Sheng K, Gou S, Wu J, Qi SX. Denoised and texture enhanced MVCT to improve soft tissue conspicuity. Med Phys. 2014;41(10):101916. View


Gayou O, Miften M. Commissioning and clinical implementation of a mega-voltage cone beam CT system for treatment localization. Med Phys. 2007;34(8):3183-92.  View


Men, Kuo, Jian-Rong Dai, Ming-Hui Li, Xin-Yuan Chen, Ke Zhang, Yuan Tian, Peng Huang, and Ying-Jie Xu. “A Method to Improve Electron Density Measurement of Cone-Beam CT Using Dual Energy Technique.”BioMed Research International 2015 (2015): 1-8. View


Higashigaito K, Angst F, Runge VM, Alkadhi H, Donati OF. Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2015; View


Saito M. Technical Note: Relation between dual-energy subtraction of CT images for electron density calibration and virtual monochromatic imaging. Med Phys. 2015;42(7):4088. View


Tu, Shu-Ju, Pei-Ying Yang, and Ching-Jung Lo. “Effect of External Targeted Radiotherapy on Dosimetry Due to Rapid Clearance of Gold Nanoparticles.” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 1 Oct. 2015. View


Ching-Jung Lo, Pei-Ying Yang, Tsi-Chian Chao, Shu-Ju Tu, Effect of contrast agent administration on consequences of dosimetry and biology in radiotherapy planning, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 784, 1 June 2015, Pages 606-609, ISSN 0168-9002. View


Zhou JJ, Gonzalez A, Lenox MW, et al. Dosimetry of a (90)Y-hydroxide liquid brachytherapy treatment approach to canine osteosarcoma using PET/CT. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;97:193-200. View


Collins fekete CA, Plamondon M, Martin AG, Vigneault É, Verhaegen F, Beaulieu L. Calcifications in low-dose rate prostate seed brachytherapy treatment: post-planning dosimetry and predictive factors. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(3):339-44. View


Moores, Matthew T., Anthony N. Pettitt, and Kerrie Mengersen. Scalable Bayesian Inference for the Inverse Temperature of a Hidden Potts Model. N.p.: n.p., 2015. View


Lu et al., “Bridge to real data: Empirical multiple material calibration for learning-based material decomposition,” 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016, pp. 457-460. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493306. View


Fujii K, Nomura K, Muramatsu Y, Obara S, Akahane K, Kusumoto M. Organ Dose Evaluations Based on Monte Carlo Simulation for CT Examinations Using Tube Current Modulation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2016; https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/174/3/387/2527778


Garcia-Vazquez, V., E. Marinetto, P. Guerra, et al. “Assessment of Intraoperative 3D Imaging Alternatives for IOERT Dose Estimation.” Elsevier, 23 Aug. 2016. Web. View


Bier B, Berger M, Maier A, et al. Scatter Correction Using a Primary Modulator on a Clinical Angiography C-arm CT System. Med Phys. 2017;  View


Garcia, L. I.R., J. F.P. Azorin, and J. F. Almansa. “A New Method to Measure Electron Density and Effective Atomic Number Using Dual-energy CT Images.” IOP Publishing, 2015. Web.


Ramos-Garcia, L. I., J. F. Pérez-Azorin, and J. F. Almansa. “Reply to Comment on ‘A New Method to Measure Electron Density and Effective Atomic Number Using Dual-energy CT Images’.” IOP Publishing, 2016. Web.